Always
remember to present your yields and percent yields in
the Results Tables.
Base the
percent yield on the theoretical yield. (Not on the
"expected yield". Please note that the theoretical
yield is never the "expected yield" as we never expect
100% yield in a chemical reaction.).
Calculate
the theoretical yield based on the moles of the
limiting reactant actually used.
(The amount actually used usually is slightly
different from that specified in the plan so you
should redo the the theoretical yield based on actual
amounts when doing the %yield calculation for an
experiment.)
Report
percent yield to the nearest percent only.
Most often the figures past the decimal place are not
significant, and, even if they are, no one is
interested in what fraction of a percent above the
nearest whole number you obtained. Think of percent
yield as a grade for the experiment: 90 is great,
70-80 good, 40-70 fair, 20-40 poor but acceptable,
0-20 very poor. What's the difference between a 79.8
and an 80.0% yield? Nothing!
Discuss reasons for lost
yield. When
discussing the yield in the Results and Discussion you
should always explore reasons for loss of yield.
Please realize that this is not an "error analysis".
Experimental errors are factors that affect the
certainty of measurements. The most significant
experimental error in a yield measurement usually is
the random error in measuring the masses of the
reactants and the product (+ or - 0.001 g?). People
often write statements to the effect of, "we obtained
a 45% yield, meaning we had 55% error in the
experiment". This is not valid! The percent error in a
percent yield is not (exptl yield - theor yield)/theor
yield x 100. Rather, it is (exptl yield - true
yield)/true yield x 100. Bottom line: "Lost yield"
does not equal "experimental error".
Your aim in
discussing reasons for lost yield is to identify some
likely places where yield was lost so that suggestions
for how to improve the yield can be made. Do not write
things like, "yield might have been lost when....." or
"we may have not cooled it down long enough". Again,
we don't want a laundry list of things that could have
gone wrong, we want to identify likely
reasons for lost yield. I suggest you go
through the following check list when trying to
identify reasons behind yield loss. You can list them
in your report, but as you list each one if you can
come up with reasons why it can be ruled out as a
significant reason then state the reason and rule it
out!
- Loss
during transfers. Identify specifically
the most problematic transfers involved in the
procedures.
- Loss
due to reaction inefficiency. Were
there side reactions that wasted the limiting
reactant? Was it a slow reaction, for which a
longer reaction period was needed to achieve
complete conversion of the limiting reactant? Was
there an unfavorable equilibrium constant
involved?
- Unavoidable
losses during work up. Examples: In
vacuum filtration steps usually the solid being
filtered is slightly soluble in the solvent being
used and so some of the solid stays dissolved in
the liquid filtrate. Similar loss occurs during
extraction steps if the desired compound has any
water solubility (it dissolves into the aqueous
layer). Distillation steps always involve loss due
to the fact that not all material can be expected
to distill out ("hold-up volume"). Drying over
sodium sulfate usually involves a decantation step
that unavoidably leaves behind some of the
solution with the drying agent.
- Procedural
mistakes, poor technique, or lab accidents. Of
course, these can play a role, but this discussion
should not be about beating yourself up or finding
blame. If there was a mistake then, by all means,
do note it and it is certainly fair to note that
you are beginners and with practice you would
probably be able to achieve a better percent
yield. Do not use having made a mistake or
accident as an out that gets you out of discussing
more weighty reasons for lost yield.